As We Now Think

Reflections, commentary and analysis from Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes at Arizona State University.

Redesigning the Future of Education

Normally home to world-class physicists, Canada’s Perimeter Institute also plays host to another high-caliber gathering of thought leaders, change makers, and young visionaries, the Equinox Summit. The 2013 Summit, underway from September 28th – October 3rd, 2013, is focused on reinventing education to equip new innovators to tackle the complex problems facing today’s world. The summit theme arose from a timely observation: children born this year will be graduating high school in the year 2030 and will face a host of ongoing challenges, including climate change, economic instability, sectarian violence, not to mention those problems we haven’t yet even imagined.

In the opening days of deliberations with participants from around the globe, I’ve made a relatively simple argument: that what we teach is far less important than teaching these future leaders how to work well with each other. Focusing on the ‘how’ is hardly a new idea – in fact, it’s a lesson I’ve been reminded of time and time again. As a high school student in the International Baccalaureate Program, I remember hearing our program coordinator repeat that “it’s not what you learn that matters, but that you learn how to learn.” Likewise, Ed Jernigan, director of the Bachelor of Knowledge Integration at the University of Waterloo frequently reminded us that an education must do two things: “help you know your world and know how to change it.”

Photo courtesy of Brian Emery and the Waterloo Global Science Initiative

Photo courtesy of Brian Emery and the Waterloo Global Science Initiative

Don’t get me wrong – content matters. We need to be familiar enough with our history to understand just why rebuilding relationships with our First Nations matters. We need to know enough about the ecosystems around us to understand how we’re affecting the climate and what that might mean for so many people. We need to understand enough about science to address pressing human needs for the benefit of us all.

But what we learn will only take us so far. Instead, the education of 2030 needs to teach us how to do three things: how to work across disciplines, how to work across communities and knowledge systems, and how to work well with others who are just like ourselves.

How to work across disciplines

Although disciplines have become powerful structures in modern academia (often enforcing core norms & beliefs through controlling the hiring, publishing, and teaching processes), the idea of working across disciplines has long been valued by educators. We idolize polymaths or Renaissance Men like Leonardo da Vinci, and we’ve built Liberal Arts, Arts & Science, and other innovative programs to pursue such goals in contemporary times.

Yet, effective interdisciplinarity practice remains an elusive goal. Developing meaningful connections across disciplines requires skilled practice, as does being able to assess such work in a way that cuts through superficial references and using the buzzwords of interdisciplinarity. Meaningful cross disciplinary work also requires the combination of both interdisciplinary practitioners (those individuals able to generate innovative ideas, facilitate communication across these gaps, and synthesize disciplinary expertise) and interdisciplinary collaborations (groups who bring together specialist expertise in diverse skill areas, and are able to leverage this expertise to get past shallow interdisciplinarity).

Several academic efforts are underway to learn about, facilitate, and improve these kinds of interdisciplinary collaboration. At Arizona State University, we are playing host to a project that brings together international research communities working on Sociotechnical Integration – that is, interdisciplinary practice that addresses both the social & scientific dimensions of complex problems. We were also involved with the First Global Conference on Research Integration & Implementation at the Australian National University, a meeting that brought together an even wider swath of projects related to inter- and transdisciplinary work (and has opened their talks and content for public viewing online).

Ongoing student driven initiatives are also pushing forward the cutting edge of interdisciplinary practice. The Combining Two Cultures conference run by undergraduate students in Ontario provides a fertile ground for supporting inter- and transdisciplinary pursuits at the undergraduate level, and challenging the notion that being a ‘jack of all trades’ means being master of none. Other associations, like Graduate Students in Integrative Society & Environment Research at Arizona State University run independent funding programs to advance new interdisciplinary research that benefits society as a whole (and are at the vanguard of wrestling with what it means to get beyond the buzzwords of interdisciplinarity on a campus that has, itself, been transformed into a 70,000+ person interdisciplinary community).

How to work across communities & knowledge systems

Another major focus of attention today is the idea of government and academic experts working directly with grassroots communities to produce knowledge and change. This is important for several reasons: ensuring that local knowledge and expertise isn’t ignored by outside experts, engaging with a more diverse set of collaborators in hopes of creating innovative solutions, and achieving higher levels of buy-in and trust to decisions that require community acceptance and behavioral change. Much as the graduates of 2030 need to be able to work across disciplinary boundaries, they also must be able to work productively and positively across communities of diverse stakeholders.

Part of the solution involves an attention to ‘epistemologies’, or the ways that an individuals’ beliefs, values, experiences, and perspectives differ in unique ways. Epistemologies certainly vary across disciplines, whether in the different types of knowledge and certainty pursued by each, or in the contrasting professional cultures, attitudes, and norms that emerge within. They also vary substantially across communities – think of the differences in experience, world views, and beliefs between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal communities. Being able to work effectively across these knowledge systems doesn’t mean that we can’t know anything or that all knowledge is relative, but rather that the graduates of 2030 need to cultivate the abilities to listen, understand, and empathize if they are to be effective leaders or scientists.

These kinds of differences between communities are also present – and powerful – in the institutions we create. Our governments, companies, and civic associations are all embedded with structures that affect what kinds of knowledge they pursue (e.g., preferring statistics to ‘messy’ qualitative data), how they collect & organize that knowledge (e.g., creating the census or election systems), and how they use that information (e.g., setting tax rates or deciding who gets access to certain benefits). These ‘knowledge systems’ form lenses through which we see the world, bringing certain things into focus while obscuring others, yet usually remain hidden and unquestioned. The graduates of 2030 need to be aware of the power that knowledge systems and epistemologies can have in shaping how we understand and interact with the world, and be empowered to confront and reimagine them in creative ways.

How to work well with others (just like ourselves)

To empower students to engage constructively with a world of complex, intertwined problems, and to be able to work across disciplines and communities requires one more skills: that we’re able to work well with others – others who are just like us.

In discussions of interdisciplinarity, this point is often obscured by a focus on the mechanics and logistics of working with those from other disciplines. Indeed, this focus is important – interdisciplinary work requires the ability to learn new languages, engage in new methods, and appreciate different theories and perspectives. Yet, it also requires an ongoing commitment to the relationships and personal dynamics in play. Scientists and other researchers are beginning to realize the centrality of basic issues like trust and buy-in, and the importance of developing interpersonal skills and creative aptitudes as part of a rich scientific education. To this end, check out a conversation I had with TVO (Television Ontario) about the role of collaborative learning.

Perhaps more challenging, though, is the realization that those we may passionately disagree with are, by and large, just like us. We each bring with us the trappings – both good and bad – of differing disciplinary training, epistemologies, and knowledge systems, which can lead to very different ways of approaching common problems. Indeed, it’s exactly the abilities to navigate that messy terrain that will prove most important for the graduates of 2030.

Interdisciplinarity, innovation, and collaboration might be the buzzwords of today’s academics, but we’re still a long way from figuring out how to do these things in a meaningful & substantial way. As we look towards training the high school graduates of 2030, we’d be wise to focus more on how we teach ourselves to work between disciplines, communities, knowledge systems, and people just like us.

Eric Kennedy is a PhD student at the Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes at Arizona State University and has a Bachelor of Knowledge Integration from the University of Waterloo. Eric’s research focuses on trust, expertise, and collaboration in complex socio-technical problems. Follow him on Twitter @EricBKennedy.

One comment on “Redesigning the Future of Education

  1. Jane Jackson
    October 29, 2013

    You wrote this important statement: “As a high school student in the International Baccalaureate Program, I remember hearing our program coordinator repeat that “it’s not what you learn that matters, but that you learn how to learn.”

    ASU is addressing this, with the Modeling Instruction Program in the Department of Physics. Below is a modeling listserv post on May 18, 2011 from Jim Burrow, a 33-year veteran physics, chemistry, and engineering teacher in Page, Arizona. Page is an isolated rural town of 7000 people, near Utah, Lake Powell and the Glen Canyon Dam. A majority of students are Navajos. Jim took the 3-week mechanics Modeling Workshop at Arizona State University in summer 2008. His degree is in the social sciences. With persistence and a school administration that lets teachers teach effectively, others can achieve what Jim Burrow did. Jim wrote:

    I need to share a modeling success story. Rich McNamara and Kelli Gamez Warble told us in their modeling course of a highly skilled and respected modeler who tells his students that his job is make himself “obsolete” by the end of the year. I have adopted the same philosophical goal with my teaching as well. It’s a lofty and worthy goal that will make me stretch, but is it attainable for others?

    I now tell you – It is! I was late about 10 minutes to my first period class because of an office meeting. I walked in the back of the room and froze. The class was a sophomore Chemistry class (not physics) reviewing stoichiometry and the students had picked up right where we left off the day before. One student was acting as moderator. Teams had white boards. They had created their own review problem and posted it on the front board. I thought I was having an out-of-body experience.  The student moderator asked the class to raise their boards and prompted them to look for similarities and differences! They proceeded to critique their own and other’s work!!!

    I ducked next door without being noticed. I grabbed my colleague and a flip cam. We went back and eavesdropped for a moment. Then I entered and shot a short video clip, trying not to interrupt their flow, and when they finished praised them for showing me that I’m “obsolete.” I shared with them the fact that they had taken a huge jump toward becoming life-long learners independent of the quality of the “teaching” they received. They were mastering critical analysis for themselves.

    I didn’t stop there. Of course my colleague with whom I’ve been sharing modeling techniques all year was impressed to see this. He could hardly believe at first that this wasn’t staged but immediately recognized the significance of the moment.  I shared the clip with my other colleagues. Each one was impressed as well.

    Later I shared the clip with my principal. He said, “Is this Inquiry?” I said yes -in part, and modeling, and lifelong learning, and critical thinking. It’s all there! I didn’t stage this – they did it on their own! He was impressed nearly to speechlessness.

    I never really expected to become “obsolete” myself. I don’t regard myself a super-skilled practitioner. I’m just a mature teacher polishing up new tricks. My students are no brighter or slower than anyone else’s. I must have been consistent in my modeling approach through the year to the point that my students internalized the collaborative processes and critical analysis skills and are now taking responsibility for their own learning. No other explanation makes sense to me. I can’t wait to see it happen again – maybe next year!

    It really was a professional high point in my career. Rich and Kelli and the other modeling instructors, regardless of content area, deserve the credit.

    -Jim Burrow
    Chemistry/Physics, Page High School, Page, AZ

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: